On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 01:54:46PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/19/2018 01:48 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > > Both __has_attribute (indirect_return) and __has_attribute > > (__indirect_return__) > > work here. > > Applications can have > > #define indirect_return > > so the variant without underscore mangling is definitely not correct.
Incorrect for what? glibc header? Yes. The libsanitizer use, where we
control the headers and what we define? No.
Jakub
