Hi.

It's revert of a hunk that causes a new ICE.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.

Ready to be installed?
Martin

gcc/ChangeLog:

2018-06-29  Martin Liska  <mli...@suse.cz>

        PR ipa/86323
        * ipa-inline.c (early_inliner): Revert wrongly added ::get call.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2018-06-29  Martin Liska  <mli...@suse.cz>

        PR ipa/86323
        * g++.dg/ipa/pr86323.C: New test.
---
 gcc/ipa-inline.c                   | 13 +++++--------
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr86323.C | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr86323.C


diff --git a/gcc/ipa-inline.c b/gcc/ipa-inline.c
index a62c1ffd3b0..a84d1d9ad3e 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-inline.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-inline.c
@@ -2802,14 +2802,11 @@ early_inliner (function *fun)
 	  for (edge = node->callees; edge; edge = edge->next_callee)
 	    {
 	      /* We have no summary for new bound store calls yet.  */
-	      ipa_call_summary *es = ipa_call_summaries->get (edge);
-	      if (es != NULL)
-		{
-		  es->call_stmt_size
-		    = estimate_num_insns (edge->call_stmt, &eni_size_weights);
-		  es->call_stmt_time
-		    = estimate_num_insns (edge->call_stmt, &eni_time_weights);
-		}
+	      ipa_call_summary *es = ipa_call_summaries->get_create (edge);
+	      es->call_stmt_size
+		= estimate_num_insns (edge->call_stmt, &eni_size_weights);
+	      es->call_stmt_time
+		= estimate_num_insns (edge->call_stmt, &eni_time_weights);
 
 	      if (edge->callee->decl
 		  && !gimple_check_call_matching_types (
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr86323.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr86323.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6632f35d86c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr86323.C
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 --param max-early-inliner-iterations=5" } */
+
+char *s;
+namespace a {
+template <class ae> class af {
+public:
+  af(ae);
+};
+typedef af<char *> b;
+namespace ag {
+class ah {
+public:
+  void ai(b aj) { c(aj); }
+  virtual void c(b);
+};
+class d : public ah {
+  void c(b);
+};
+class e {
+  void f(bool);
+  void ai(b aj) { g.ai(aj); }
+  d g;
+};
+void d::c(b) {}
+void e::f(bool) { ai(s); }
+}
+}

Reply via email to