On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> In PR65321 I've added lower_subreg call on the last argument of ASHIFT, but
> as the following testcase shows, use_narrower_mode_test has not been updated
> correspondingly to verify lower_subreg will actually work.
> On the testcase validate_subreg actually is happy about it, but because op1
> is already a (subreg:SI (reg:V32HI ) 48) and simplify_subreg fails, it fails
> anyway.
> 
> Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for
> trunk?

OK.

Richard.

> 2018-06-20  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR debug/86194
>       * var-tracking.c (use_narrower_mode_test): Check if shift amount can
>       be narrowed.
> 
>       * gcc.target/i386/pr86194.c: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/var-tracking.c.jj     2018-06-13 10:05:53.146127176 +0200
> +++ gcc/var-tracking.c        2018-06-20 11:06:29.045456044 +0200
> @@ -964,6 +964,24 @@ use_narrower_mode_test (rtx x, const_rtx
>         case MULT:
>           break;
>         case ASHIFT:
> +         if (GET_MODE (XEXP (x, 1)) != VOIDmode)
> +           {
> +             enum machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (subreg);
> +             rtx op1 = XEXP (x, 1);
> +             enum machine_mode op1_mode = GET_MODE (op1);
> +             if (GET_MODE_PRECISION (as_a <scalar_int_mode> (mode))
> +                 < GET_MODE_PRECISION (as_a <scalar_int_mode> (op1_mode)))
> +               {
> +                 poly_uint64 byte = subreg_lowpart_offset (mode, op1_mode);
> +                 if (GET_CODE (op1) == SUBREG || GET_CODE (op1) == CONCAT)
> +                   {
> +                     if (!simplify_subreg (mode, op1, op1_mode, byte))
> +                       return false;
> +                   }
> +                 else if (!validate_subreg (mode, op1_mode, op1, byte))
> +                   return false;
> +               }
> +           }
>           iter.substitute (XEXP (x, 0));
>           break;
>         default:
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr86194.c.jj        2018-06-20 
> 11:12:46.801031294 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr86194.c   2018-06-20 11:08:56.508680601 
> +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +/* PR debug/86194 */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O -g -mavx512bw" } */
> +
> +typedef unsigned U __attribute__ ((vector_size (64)));
> +typedef unsigned long V __attribute__ ((vector_size (64)));
> +typedef unsigned __int128 W __attribute__ ((vector_size (64)));
> +
> +U u;
> +
> +W
> +bar (W w)
> +{
> +  U k = u;
> +  w <<= (W)(U) { 5, 3, 3, 0, 7, 3, 1, 3, k[7] };
> +  k += (U) { -(char)w[3] } != k;
> +  return (W)k + w;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +foo (void)
> +{
> +  u = (U){ bar ((W)(V) { 0, ~0, 0, 0, 0, 0, ~0 })[0] };
> +}
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 
21284 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to