Hello world,

the attached patch fixes a bug which was uncovered by the PR in
a matmul regression.

The problem is that bounds checking on the LHS with reallocation on
assignment makes no sense, and the original flag was not set for
the case in question.

I added both the original test and the reduced test to the single test
case.

OK for trunk?

Regards

        Thomas

2018-06-08  Thomas Koenig  <tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/85631
        * trans.h (gfc_ss): Add field no_bounds_check.
        * trans-array.c (gfc_conv_ss_startstride): If flag_realloc_lhs and
        ss->no_bounds_check is set, do not use runtime checks.
        * trans-expr.c (gfc_trans_assignment_1): Set lss->no_bounds_check
        for reallocatable lhs.

2018-06-08  Thomas Koenig  <tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/85631
        * gfortran.dg/bounds_check_20.f90: New test.
Index: trans-array.c
===================================================================
--- trans-array.c	(Revision 261245)
+++ trans-array.c	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -4304,7 +4304,7 @@ done:
 	}
     }
 
-  /* The rest is just runtime bound checking.  */
+  /* The rest is just runtime bounds checking.  */
   if (gfc_option.rtcheck & GFC_RTCHECK_BOUNDS)
     {
       stmtblock_t block;
@@ -4334,7 +4334,7 @@ done:
 	    continue;
 
 	  /* Catch allocatable lhs in f2003.  */
-	  if (flag_realloc_lhs && ss->is_alloc_lhs)
+	  if (flag_realloc_lhs && ss->no_bounds_check)
 	    continue;
 
 	  expr = ss_info->expr;
Index: trans-expr.c
===================================================================
--- trans-expr.c	(Revision 261245)
+++ trans-expr.c	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -9982,12 +9982,15 @@ gfc_trans_assignment_1 (gfc_expr * expr1, gfc_expr
 
   /* Walk the lhs.  */
   lss = gfc_walk_expr (expr1);
-  if (gfc_is_reallocatable_lhs (expr1)
-      && !(expr2->expr_type == EXPR_FUNCTION
-	   && expr2->value.function.isym != NULL
-	   && !(expr2->value.function.isym->elemental
-		|| expr2->value.function.isym->conversion)))
-    lss->is_alloc_lhs = 1;
+  if (gfc_is_reallocatable_lhs (expr1))
+    {
+      lss->no_bounds_check = 1;
+      if (!(expr2->expr_type == EXPR_FUNCTION
+	    && expr2->value.function.isym != NULL
+	    && !(expr2->value.function.isym->elemental
+		 || expr2->value.function.isym->conversion)))
+	lss->is_alloc_lhs = 1;
+    }
 
   rss = NULL;
 
Index: trans.h
===================================================================
--- trans.h	(Revision 261245)
+++ trans.h	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ typedef struct gfc_ss
   struct gfc_loopinfo *loop;
 
   unsigned is_alloc_lhs:1;
+  unsigned no_bounds_check:1;
 }
 gfc_ss;
 #define gfc_get_ss() XCNEW (gfc_ss)
! { dg-do  run }
! { dg-additional-options "-fcheck=bounds -ffrontend-optimize" }
! PR 85631 - this used to cause a runtime error with bounds checking.
module x
contains
  subroutine sub(a, b)
    real, dimension(:,:), intent(in) :: a
    real, dimension(:,:), intent(out), allocatable :: b
    b = transpose(a)
  end subroutine sub
end module x

program main
  use x
  implicit none
  real, dimension(2,2) :: a
  real, dimension(:,:), allocatable :: b
  data a /-2., 3., -5., 7./
  call sub(a, b)
  if (any (b /= reshape([-2., -5., 3., 7.], shape(b)))) stop 1
  b = matmul(transpose(b), a)
  if (any (b /= reshape([-11., 15., -25.,  34.], shape(b)))) stop 2
end program

Reply via email to