On 10/26/2011 07:00 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
.. maybe my message wasn't clear, sorry, I'm a bit tired (here it's late): I meant to say that the non_reference tweak fixes the non-template impl class case, but something more is needed for a template impl (thus the new testcase). And, additionally, this issue is a [4.6/4.7 Regression], thus, post 4.6.2, we may be interested in back porting something.
Ah.
Let me know if you need additional details, or what else.
How is the template case failing?
Or we want me to look into a different way to attack the template case.
Please. Jason
