On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 07:53:15AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On May 9, 2018 10:52:05 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > >Hi! > > > >glibc <= 2.23 has buggy nextafterl/nexttowardl as can be seen on the > >nextafter-2.c testcase. > > > >Do we want to workaround this bug, e.g. with the following patch? > > Works for me. Was the reason to test the target libc to test the compare > against arithmetic?
Yes, to verify that the GCC implementation matches the libc one.
Jakub
