On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:28:09PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 01:59:40PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> And this one puts the check in asan_init rather than its users. OK?
> >
> > tsan tests have the same problem.
>
> Hmm, tsan tests work fine for me under ulimit -v.
Weird.
> > Wouldn't it be better to have a helper procedure for this and use it next to
> > if [check_effective_target_fsanitize_address]
>
> Ah, of course, that's where it belongs. Done below.
>
> > What exactly does return -code return?
>
> It forces the caller to return as well.
> commit f980f806f93982ba54390d45ac5ccc8b350b160c
> Author: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri Mar 23 11:14:50 2018 -0400
>
> * lib/asan-dg.exp: Don't run tests if ulimit -v is set.
Ok.
Jakub
