On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Jason Merrill wrote:

On 08/09/2011 09:14 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
I don't think we should define the C++ 2011 value yet. In my opinion, we
should wait until:
1) the standard is official
2) gcc implements most of it: people will want to use __cplusplus as a
test to know if they can use C++0X features, not if the compiler does
some effort to implement half of them.

I'm of two minds about this, but I see that clang and edg still use 199711L in C++0x mode, so let's stick with that for now.

Note that at least clang now defines __cplusplus to its new C++11 value (in experimental C++0X mode only). Apparently they switched around last June and say they are not the only ones. So if you want to follow their lead...

--
Marc Glisse

Reply via email to