On 14/03/18 10:11, Sudakshina Das wrote:
> Hi
> 
> This patch fixes PR82989 so that we avoid NEON instructions when
> -mneon-for-64bits is not enabled. This is more of a short term fix for
> the real deeper problem of making and early decision of choosing or
> rejecting NEON instructions. There is now a new ticket PR84467 to deal
> with the longer term solution.
> (Please refer to the discussion in the bug report for more details).
> 
> Testing: Bootstrapped and regtested on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and
> added a new test case based on the test given on the bug report.
> 
> Ok for trunk and backports for gcc-7 and gcc-6 branches?
> 

OK for trunk.  Please leave it a couple of days before backporting to
ensure that the testcase doesn't tickle any multilib issues.

R.

> Sudi
> 
> 
> *** gcc/ChangeLog ***
> 
> 2018-03-14  Sudakshina Das  <sudi....@arm.com>
> 
>     * config/arm/neon.md (ashldi3_neon): Update ?s for constraints
>     to favor GPR over NEON registers.
>     (<shift>di3_neon): Likewise.
> 
> *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog ***
> 
> 2018-03-14  Sudakshina Das  <sudi....@arm.com>
> 
>     * gcc.target/arm/pr82989.c: New test.
> 
> pr82989.diff
> 
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/neon.md b/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
> index 6a6f5d7..1646b21 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
> @@ -1180,12 +1180,12 @@
>  )
>  
>  (define_insn_and_split "ashldi3_neon"
> -  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "s_register_operand"         "= w, w,?&r,?r,?&r, 
> ?w,w")
> -     (ashift:DI (match_operand:DI 1 "s_register_operand" " 0w, w, 0r, 0,  r, 
> 0w,w")
> -                (match_operand:SI 2 "general_operand"    "rUm, i,  r, i,  
> i,rUm,i")))
> -   (clobber (match_scratch:SI 3                                  "= X, 
> X,?&r, X,  X,  X,X"))
> -   (clobber (match_scratch:SI 4                                  "= X, 
> X,?&r, X,  X,  X,X"))
> -   (clobber (match_scratch:DI 5                                  "=&w, X,  
> X, X,  X, &w,X"))
> +  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "s_register_operand"         "= w, w, &r, r, &r, 
> ?w,?w")
> +     (ashift:DI (match_operand:DI 1 "s_register_operand" " 0w, w, 0r, 0,  r, 
> 0w, w")
> +                (match_operand:SI 2 "general_operand"    "rUm, i,  r, i,  
> i,rUm, i")))
> +   (clobber (match_scratch:SI 3                                  "= X, X, 
> &r, X,  X,  X, X"))
> +   (clobber (match_scratch:SI 4                                  "= X, X, 
> &r, X,  X,  X, X"))
> +   (clobber (match_scratch:DI 5                                  "=&w, X,  
> X, X,  X, &w, X"))
>     (clobber (reg:CC_C CC_REGNUM))]
>    "TARGET_NEON"
>    "#"
> @@ -1276,7 +1276,7 @@
>  ;; ashrdi3_neon
>  ;; lshrdi3_neon
>  (define_insn_and_split "<shift>di3_neon"
> -  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "s_register_operand"          "= w, 
> w,?&r,?r,?&r,?w,?w")
> +  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "s_register_operand"          "= w, w, &r, r, 
> &r,?w,?w")
>       (RSHIFTS:DI (match_operand:DI 1 "s_register_operand" " 0w, w, 0r, 0,  
> r,0w, w")
>                   (match_operand:SI 2 "reg_or_int_operand" "  r, i,  r, i,  
> i, r, i")))
>     (clobber (match_scratch:SI 3                                   "=2r, X, 
> &r, X,  X,2r, X"))
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr82989.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr82989.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1295ee6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr82989.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +/* PR target/82989 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon_ok } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicts with multilib options" { *-*-* } { 
> "-mcpu=*" } { "-mcpu=cortex-a8" } } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicts with multilib options" { *-*-* } { 
> "-mfpu=*" } { "-mfpu=neon" } } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicts with multilib options" { *-*-* } { 
> "-mfloat-abi=*" } { "-mfloat-abi=hard" } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mcpu=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard" } */
> +/* { dg-add-options arm_neon } */
> +
> +typedef unsigned long long uint64_t;
> +
> +void f_shr_imm (uint64_t *a )
> +{
> +  *a += *a >> 32;
> +}
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "vshr*" } } */
> +
> +void f_shr_reg (uint64_t *a, uint64_t b)
> +{
> +  *a += *a >> b;
> +}
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "vshl*" } } */
> +/* Only 2 times for f_shr_reg. f_shr_imm should not have any.  */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {lsr\tr[0-9]+, r[0-9]+, r[0-9]} 2 } } */
> +
> +void f_shl_imm (uint64_t *a)
> +{
> +  *a += *a << 32;
> +}
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "vshl*" } } */
> +
> +void f_shl_reg (uint64_t *a, uint64_t b)
> +{
> +  *a += *a << b;
> +}
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "vshl*" } } */
> +/* Only 2 times for f_shl_reg. f_shl_imm should not have any.  */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {lsl\tr[0-9]+, r[0-9]+, r[0-9]} 2 } } */
> 

Reply via email to