On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 01:33:45PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Here's another case of a template code leaking into cxx_constant_value.
> > While I recently added the require_rvalue_constant_expression check, it
> > doesn't help here, because the problem is that we have a MODOP_EXPR (a
> > template code), whose op1 is a TRUNC_DIV_EXPR without a type, so it's
> > considered dependent, so fold_non_dependent_expr doesn't do its job.
> 
> If it's dependent, we should have taken the dependent path earlier in
> the function.  Should that test use
> instantiation_dependent_expression_p rather than the existing type or
> value dependent check?

I guess so.  It fixes the ICE, though the error disappears unless we call
a.b().  But that's probably expected.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?

2018-03-13  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/84596
        * semantics.c (finish_static_assert): Check
        instantiation_dependent_expression_p instead of
        {type,value}_dependent_expression_p.

        * g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert15.C: New test.

diff --git gcc/cp/semantics.c gcc/cp/semantics.c
index bb8b5953539..fdf37bea770 100644
--- gcc/cp/semantics.c
+++ gcc/cp/semantics.c
@@ -8630,8 +8630,7 @@ finish_static_assert (tree condition, tree message, 
location_t location,
   if (check_for_bare_parameter_packs (condition))
     condition = error_mark_node;
 
-  if (type_dependent_expression_p (condition) 
-      || value_dependent_expression_p (condition))
+  if (instantiation_dependent_expression_p (condition))
     {
       /* We're in a template; build a STATIC_ASSERT and put it in
          the right place. */
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert15.C 
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert15.C
index e69de29bb2d..a740f73fd4a 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert15.C
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert15.C
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/84596
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<int x>
+struct a {
+  constexpr void b() {
+    int c;
+    static_assert(c %= 1, "");
+  }
+};

        Marek

Reply via email to