On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:48:45AM +0000, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Alexandre Oliva <aol...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 21, 2018, Alexandre Oliva <aol...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Feb 15, 2018, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.n...@arm.com> wrote:
> >>> i see assembler slow downs with these location view patches
> >>> i opened https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
> >
> >
> >> [LVU] reset view at function entry, omit views at line zero
> >
> > Ping? https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg01224.html
>
> Hi,
> The new test case failed on aarch64-none-elf, aarch64_be-none-elf and
> arm-none-eabi ,
> which are all bare-metal toolchains with below message:
>
> xgcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-pthread'
>
> I assume pthread is unavailable on such targets if it's required.
I think this ought to fix it, committed as obvious:
2018-03-09 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR debug/84404
* gcc.dg/graphite/pr84404.c: Only compile on pthread effective
targets.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/pr84404.c.jj 2018-03-08 21:53:46.096560261
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/pr84404.c 2018-03-09 10:54:49.605773196
+0100
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* PR debug/84404 */
+/* { dg-do compile { target pthread } } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -floop-nest-optimize -g" } */
int te[9];
Jakub
