On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com> wrote: >> For the middle-end part I'd like to see output_function_exception_table take >> an enum with two members with appropriate name - I see there wasn't >> documentation for the function but your change doesn't make semantics more >> clear, esp. >> >> - output_one_function_exception_table (0); >> - if (crtl->eh.call_site_record_v[1]) >> - output_one_function_exception_table (1); >> + output_one_function_exception_table (section); >> >> looks like we now might output only once while we did twice before... >> >> Looking at the two changed callers doesn't shed enough light on this >> either... > > See output_one_function_exception_table itself which has the same argument and > the other functions in the file: 0 corresponds to the table for hot part while > 1 corresponds to the table for the cold part (if any). Before the change, > output_function_exception_table outputs both parts at once whereas, after the > change, it outputs one part at a time, and thus is called twice from final.c.
I see. > I can certainly add the missing documentation for this whole section stuff. Please. Ok with that change. Richard. > -- > Eric Botcazou
