On 2/13/18 5:51 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > We can backport without having a failing testcase. Let's do that for 7 > at least?
Ok, the backport tested clean, so I committed it. Thanks. Peter
On 2/13/18 5:51 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > We can backport without having a failing testcase. Let's do that for 7 > at least?
Ok, the backport tested clean, so I committed it. Thanks. Peter