On 1/29/18 6:15 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> The current version of that code looks like the following, which I should >> copy instead. Unless you have a different suggestion? > > Looks better yeah :-) Probably candidates_list_and_hint does similar > nasty character counting, but we don't have to look at it ;-)
It does, but as I mention in the other reply, I don't think we want this, since the user used a valid option argument (ie, "native") and we don't want to give a "hint" as a valid option, since their option was valid. Like I said in the other reply, I think we do want the code the patch showed. Either that, or I could still call candidates_list_and_hint() and just throw the hint away, since it's meaningless. Peter
