On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Segher Boessenkool
<seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> Thist patch merges the safe-indirect-jump-1.c and -8.c testcases,
> since they do the same thing. On the 64-bit and AIX ABIs the indirect
> call is not a sibcall, since there is code generated after the call
> (the restore of r2). On the 32-bit non-AIX ABIs it is a sibcall.
>
> Tested on powerpc64-linux {-m32,-m64}, and on powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.3.0 .
> Is this okay for trunk and 7 branch?
>
>
> Segher
>
>
> 2018-01-26 Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org>
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * gcc.target/powerpc/safe-indirect-jump-1.c: Build on all targets.
> Make expected output depend on whether we expect sibcalls or not.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/safe-indirect-jump-8.c: Delete (merged into
> safe-indirect-jump-1.c).
Okay.
Thanks, David
