Hi!

Unnamed bitfields are not data members, so we should ignore them when
counting the members or picking up members to initialize from, and
also should ignore them in find_decomp_class_base, they can appear
in various bases etc. and still there could be just one base containing
direct non-static data members.

The patch also fixes an issue I ran into on the testcase, when recursing
from type in which we've found any direct non-static data members, we have
ret set to that type and if the recursion doesn't find anything nor an
error, it returns that ret rather than NULL.  So, if t == ret, it just
means it didn't find anything preventing return of ret to the caller.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2018-01-25  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/84031
        * decl.c (find_decomp_class_base): Ignore unnamed bitfields.  Ignore
        recursive calls that return ret.
        (cp_finish_decomp): Ignore unnamed bitfields.

        * g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp36.C: New test.

--- gcc/cp/decl.c.jj    2018-01-24 17:18:42.376392255 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/decl.c       2018-01-25 10:22:51.267122576 +0100
@@ -7206,7 +7206,9 @@ find_decomp_class_base (location_t loc,
 {
   bool member_seen = false;
   for (tree field = TYPE_FIELDS (type); field; field = DECL_CHAIN (field))
-    if (TREE_CODE (field) != FIELD_DECL || DECL_ARTIFICIAL (field))
+    if (TREE_CODE (field) != FIELD_DECL
+       || DECL_ARTIFICIAL (field)
+       || (DECL_C_BIT_FIELD (field) && !DECL_NAME (field)))
       continue;
     else if (ret)
       return type;
@@ -7245,7 +7247,7 @@ find_decomp_class_base (location_t loc,
       tree t = find_decomp_class_base (loc, TREE_TYPE (base_binfo), ret);
       if (t == error_mark_node)
        return error_mark_node;
-      if (t != NULL_TREE)
+      if (t != NULL_TREE && t != ret)
        {
          if (ret == type)
            {
@@ -7256,9 +7258,6 @@ find_decomp_class_base (location_t loc,
            }
          else if (orig_ret != NULL_TREE)
            return t;
-         else if (ret == t)
-           /* OK, found the same base along another path.  We'll complain
-              in convert_to_base if it's ambiguous.  */;
          else if (ret != NULL_TREE)
            {
              error_at (loc, "cannot decompose class type %qT: its base "
@@ -7645,7 +7644,9 @@ cp_finish_decomp (tree decl, tree first,
          goto error_out;
        }
       for (tree field = TYPE_FIELDS (btype); field; field = TREE_CHAIN (field))
-       if (TREE_CODE (field) != FIELD_DECL || DECL_ARTIFICIAL (field))
+       if (TREE_CODE (field) != FIELD_DECL
+           || DECL_ARTIFICIAL (field)
+           || (DECL_C_BIT_FIELD (field) && !DECL_NAME (field)))
          continue;
        else
          eltscnt++;
@@ -7660,7 +7661,9 @@ cp_finish_decomp (tree decl, tree first,
        }
       unsigned int i = 0;
       for (tree field = TYPE_FIELDS (btype); field; field = TREE_CHAIN (field))
-       if (TREE_CODE (field) != FIELD_DECL || DECL_ARTIFICIAL (field))
+       if (TREE_CODE (field) != FIELD_DECL
+           || DECL_ARTIFICIAL (field)
+           || (DECL_C_BIT_FIELD (field) && !DECL_NAME (field)))
          continue;
        else
          {
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp36.C.jj    2018-01-25 10:25:23.900154509 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp36.C       2018-01-25 10:25:15.996152860 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// PR c++/84031
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "" }
+
+struct A { unsigned char : 1, a1 : 1, a2 : 2, : 1, a3 : 3; };
+struct B { unsigned char : 1, : 7; };
+struct C : B { constexpr C () : c1 (1), c2 (2), c3 (3) {} unsigned char : 1, 
c1 : 1, c2 : 2, : 1, c3 : 3; };
+struct D : C { constexpr D () {} unsigned char : 1, : 7; };
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  static constexpr A a { 1, 2, 3 };
+  const auto &[a1, a2, a3] = a;                // { dg-warning "only available 
with" "" { target c++14_down } }
+  static_assert (a1 == 1 && a2 == 2 && a3 == 3, "");
+  static constexpr D d;
+  const auto &[d1, d2, d3] = d;                // { dg-warning "only available 
with" "" { target c++14_down } }
+  static_assert (d1 == 1 && d2 == 2 && d3 == 3, "");
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to