On 23 January 2018 at 15:57, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com> wrote: > Hi Christophe, > > On 23/01/18 13:09, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> >> Hi Kyrill, >> >> On 22 January 2018 at 11:48, Kyrill Tkachov >> <kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This test has needlessly restrictive requirements. It tries to force a >>> soft-float target and tries to run. >>> This makes it unsupportable for any non-soft-float variant. >>> In fact, the test can be a run-time test for any target, and only the >>> scan-assembler tests are specific to >>> -mfloat-abi=soft. So this patch makes the test always runnable and makes >>> the >>> scan-assembler checks predicable >>> on the the new arm_sotftfloat effective target check. >>> >> Unfortunately, the test now fails on armeb-linux-gnueabihf (it used to >> be unsupported). >> my logs only show: >> qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault) - core dumped > > > :( it runs fine for me on a armeb-none-eabi --with-float=hard target with a > Foundation Model. > Unfortunately I don't have access to an armeb-non-linux-gnueabihf setup. > Could you provide more detailed configuration options so that I can try to > reproduce the > exact -march -m[arm,thumb], -mfpu setup? >
I'm using qemu in user-mode, and I see this error on the 3 configurations I test: --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-mode=arm or thumb --with-fpu=neon-fp16 or vfpv3-d16-fp16 HTH > Thanks, > Kyrill > > >> on arm-linux-gnueabihf, it's OK (the test was unsupported, but now passes) >> >> Christophe >> >>> Committing to trunk. >>> Thanks, >>> Kyrill >>> >>> 2018-01-22 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com> >>> >>> * doc/sourcebuild.texi (arm_softfloat): Document. >>> >>> 2018-01-22 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com> >>> >>> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_arm_softfloat): >>> New procedure. >>> * gcc.target/arm/copysign_softfloat_1.c: Allow running everywhere. >>> Adjust scan-assembler checks for soft-float. > >
