On 01/19/2018 04:08 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 01/19/2018 02:21 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
How about keeping profile_uninitialized at the zero value location and
asserting m_quality != profile_uninitialized ?
Thanks,
- Tom
Yes, that would be possible.
Can you please test that the patch does not generate warnings?
Confirmed, the warnings are gone.
Thanks,
- Tom
I'm running regression tests.
Martin
0001-Fix-profile_quality-sanity-check.patch
From e1159c2404947f675200efc4476e7e0994b81101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin <mli...@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:27:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix profile_quality sanity check.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018-01-18 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
* profile-count.h (enum profile_quality): Add
profile_uninitialized as the first value. Do not number values
as they are zero based.
(profile_count::verify): Update sanity check.
(profile_probability::verify): Likewise.
---
gcc/profile-count.h | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/profile-count.h b/gcc/profile-count.h
index 7a43917ebbc..828d6d0ee4b 100644
--- a/gcc/profile-count.h
+++ b/gcc/profile-count.h
@@ -26,34 +26,36 @@ struct function;
/* Quality of the profile count. Because gengtype does not support enums
inside of classes, this is in global namespace. */
enum profile_quality {
+ /* Uninitialized value. */
+ profile_uninitialized,
/* Profile is based on static branch prediction heuristics and may
or may not match reality. It is local to function and can not be
compared
inter-procedurally. Never used by probabilities (they are always local).
*/
- profile_guessed_local = 1,
+ profile_guessed_local,
/* Profile was read by feedback and was 0, we used local heuristics to guess
better. This is the case of functions not run in profile fedback.
Never used by probabilities. */
- profile_guessed_global0 = 2,
+ profile_guessed_global0,
/* Same as profile_guessed_global0 but global count is adjusted 0. */
- profile_guessed_global0adjusted = 3,
+ profile_guessed_global0adjusted,
/* Profile is based on static branch prediction heuristics. It may or may
not reflect the reality but it can be compared interprocedurally
(for example, we inlined function w/o profile feedback into function
with feedback and propagated from that).
Never used by probablities. */
- profile_guessed = 4,
+ profile_guessed,
/* Profile was determined by autofdo. */
- profile_afdo = 5,
+ profile_afdo,
/* Profile was originally based on feedback but it was adjusted
by code duplicating optimization. It may not precisely reflect the
particular code path. */
- profile_adjusted = 6,
+ profile_adjusted,
/* Profile was read from profile feedback or determined by accurate static
method. */
- profile_precise = 7
+ profile_precise
};
/* The base value for branch probability notes and edge probabilities. */
@@ -505,8 +507,7 @@ public:
/* Return false if profile_probability is bogus. */
bool verify () const
{
- gcc_checking_assert (profile_guessed_local <= m_quality
- && m_quality <= profile_precise);
+ gcc_checking_assert (m_quality != profile_uninitialized);
if (m_val == uninitialized_probability)
return m_quality == profile_guessed;
else if (m_quality < profile_guessed)
@@ -786,8 +787,7 @@ public:
/* Return false if profile_count is bogus. */
bool verify () const
{
- gcc_checking_assert (profile_guessed_local <= m_quality
- && m_quality <= profile_precise);
+ gcc_checking_assert (m_quality != profile_uninitialized);
return m_val != uninitialized_count || m_quality ==
profile_guessed_local;
}