On 01/19/2018 01:59 AM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
Here's the updated patch with the changes that you requested. There are
no new regressions in trunk. I tested it on my desktop running driver
387.34 on a Pascal GPU.

Is this OK for trunk?

OK with 'PR target/83790' added to the changelog entry.

Thanks,
- Tom


trunk-cuda9.diff


2018-01-18  Cesar Philippidis  <ce...@codesourcery.com>

        gcc/
        * config/nvptx/nvptx.c (output_init_frag): Don't use generic address
        spaces for function labels.

        gcc/testsuite/
        * gcc.target/nvptx/indirect_call.c: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
index 86fc13f4fc0..4cb87c8ad07 100644
--- a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
+++ b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
@@ -1899,9 +1899,15 @@ output_init_frag (rtx sym)
if (sym)
      {
-      fprintf (asm_out_file, "generic(");
+      bool function = (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (sym)
+                      && (TREE_CODE (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (sym)) == FUNCTION_DECL));
+      if (!function)
+       fprintf (asm_out_file, "generic(");
        output_address (VOIDmode, sym);
-      fprintf (asm_out_file, val ? ") + " : ")");
+      if (!function)
+       fprintf (asm_out_file, ")");
+      if (val)
+       fprintf (asm_out_file, " + ");
      }
if (!sym || val)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/nvptx/indirect_call.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/nvptx/indirect_call.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..39992a7137b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/nvptx/indirect_call.c
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -msoft-stack" } */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+
+int
+f1 (int a)
+{
+  return a + 1;
+}
+
+int (*f2)(int) = f1;
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  if (f2 (100) != 101)
+    __builtin_abort();
+
+  return 0;
+}


Reply via email to