Hi! On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 09:29:13AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > Did you consider simply removing the tablejump/casesi support so > expansion always > expands to a balanced tree? At least if we have any knobs to tune we > should probably > tweak them away from the indirect jump using variants with > -mno-speculate-indirect-jumps, > right?
We can generate indirect jumps for other situations so this patch will still be needed. > Performance optimization, so shouldn't block this patch - I just > thought I should probably > mention this. Yeah let's get this done first :-) Segher
