Hi Christophe,
On 11/01/18 16:21, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 11 January 2018 at 16:33, Kyrill Tkachov
<kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
Hi all,
This recently added test fails on arm. We haven't implemented these
intrinsics for arm
(any volunteers?) so for now let's XFAIL these on that target.
Also, the float64 versions of these intrinsics are not supposed to be
available on arm
so this patch slightly adjusts the test to not include them for aarch32.
In any case the entire test is XFAILed on arm, so this doesn't have any
noticeable
effect.
The same number of tests (PASS) still occur on aarch64 but now they appear
as XFAIL
rather than FAIL on arm.
Ok for trunk? (from an aarch64 perspective).
I think Kugan was planning to skip them on arm instead?
These intrinsics are specified to exist on arm as well:
(search on https://developer.arm.com/technologies/neon/intrinsics)
except the float64 ones, so from a purist perspective the tests
should be passing on arm, but we know the reason why they're not
(they are not implemented there), which is the rationale for XFAIL.
Does XFAILing them interact badly with any bookkeeping that your
testing system does?
Thanks,
Kyrill
Thanks,
Kyrill
2018-01-11 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c: Make float64
tests specific to aarch64. XFAIL test on arm.
