On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 08:50:30AM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 01/04/2018 01:30 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 05:00:41PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > > This is an example where having a solution for bug 78014 would
> > > be helpful. I.e., a -Wformat checker to help enforce the use
> >
> > No, because %zu isn't portable enough for all the hosts we support.
>
> GCC could mitigate all these portability pitfalls by providing
> its own versions of the functions (I suggested gcc_printf the
> last time we discussed this subject). libiberty already does
> this for a small subset of the portability problems in some of
> the standard functions (including vsprintf), so this would be
> a natural extension of that approach.
Ugh, no.
Jakub
