On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 06:26:12PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> 2017-10-23  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandif...@linaro.org>
>           Alan Hayward  <alan.hayw...@arm.com>
>           David Sherwood  <david.sherw...@arm.com>
...

> --- /dev/null 2017-10-21 08:51:42.385141415 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect-opt-info-1.c    2017-10-23 17:22:26.571498977 
> +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/* { dg-options "-std=c99 -fopt-info -O3" } */
> +
> +void
> +vadd (int *dst, int *op1, int *op2, int count)
> +{
> +  for (int i = 0; i < count; ++i)
> +    dst[i] = op1[i] + op2[i];
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-message "loop vectorized" "" { target *-*-* } 6 } */
> +/* { dg-message "loop versioned for vectorization because of possible 
> aliasing" "" { target *-*-* } 6 } */

This testcase fails e.g. on i686-linux.  The problem is
1) it really should be at least guarded with
/* { dg-do compile { target vect_int } } */
because on targets that can't vectorize even simple int operations
this will obviously fail
2) that won't help for i686 though, because we need -msse2 added
to options for it to work; that is normally added by
check_vect_support_and_set_flags
only when in vect.exp.  If it was just that target, we could add
dg-additional-options, but I'm afraid many other targets add some options.

The following works for me, calling it nodump-* ensures that
-fdump-tree-* isn't added, which I believe is essential for the testcase;
tested on x86_64-linux with
RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m32/-mno-sse,-m64\} vect.exp=nodump*'
ok for trunk?

Sadly I don't have your broken development version of the patch, so can't
verify it fails with the broken patch.

2018-01-03  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        * gcc.dg/vect-opt-info-1.c: Moved to ...
        * gcc.dg/vect/nodump-vect-opt-info-1.c: ... here.  Only run on
        vect_int targets, use dg-additional-options instead of dg-options and
        use relative line numbers instead of absolute.

--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect-opt-info-1.c.jj   2018-01-03 10:04:47.568412808 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect-opt-info-1.c      2018-01-03 22:14:44.082848915 
+0100
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-/* { dg-options "-std=c99 -fopt-info -O3" } */
-
-void
-vadd (int *dst, int *op1, int *op2, int count)
-{
-  for (int i = 0; i < count; ++i)
-    dst[i] = op1[i] + op2[i];
-}
-
-/* { dg-message "loop vectorized" "" { target *-*-* } 6 } */
-/* { dg-message "loop versioned for vectorization because of possible 
aliasing" "" { target *-*-* } 6 } */
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/nodump-vect-opt-info-1.c.jj       2018-01-03 
22:14:49.387852927 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/nodump-vect-opt-info-1.c  2018-01-03 
22:17:30.437974412 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target vect_int } } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-std=c99 -fopt-info -O3" } */
+
+void
+vadd (int *dst, int *op1, int *op2, int count)
+{
+/* { dg-message "loop vectorized" "" { target *-*-* } .+2 } */
+/* { dg-message "loop versioned for vectorization because of possible 
aliasing" "" { target *-*-* } .+1 } */
+  for (int i = 0; i < count; ++i)
+    dst[i] = op1[i] + op2[i];
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to