>>> On 02.01.18 at 11:05, <hubi...@ucw.cz> wrote:
>> >>> On 13.12.17 at 10:33,  wrote:
>> > Simply mirror the MODE_XI logic of handling unaligned operands in
>> > mov<mode>_internal into MODE_TI / MODE_OI handling.
>> > 
>> > gcc/
>> > 2017-12-13  Jan Beulich  <jbeul...@suse.com>
>> > 
>> >    * sse.md (mov<mode>_internal): Tighten condition for when to use
>> >    vmovdqu<ssescalarsize> for TI and OI modes.
>> > 
>> > gcc/testsuite/
>> > 2017-12-13  Jan Beulich  <jbeul...@suse.com>
>> > 
>> >    * gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-no-vmovdqu8.c,
>> >    gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-no-vmovdqu16.c: New.
> 
> Looks OK. We do not need to update instruction attribute becuase we make no
> difference between those instructions and both ends up being ssemov?

I think so, yes, but my opinion here is certainly not meaning much.

Jan

Reply via email to