>>> On 02.01.18 at 11:05, <hubi...@ucw.cz> wrote: >> >>> On 13.12.17 at 10:33, wrote: >> > Simply mirror the MODE_XI logic of handling unaligned operands in >> > mov<mode>_internal into MODE_TI / MODE_OI handling. >> > >> > gcc/ >> > 2017-12-13 Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >> > >> > * sse.md (mov<mode>_internal): Tighten condition for when to use >> > vmovdqu<ssescalarsize> for TI and OI modes. >> > >> > gcc/testsuite/ >> > 2017-12-13 Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >> > >> > * gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-no-vmovdqu8.c, >> > gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-no-vmovdqu16.c: New. > > Looks OK. We do not need to update instruction attribute becuase we make no > difference between those instructions and both ends up being ssemov?
I think so, yes, but my opinion here is certainly not meaning much. Jan