On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:53 PM, David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 15:35 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 8:12 PM, David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> > I rebased the v2 patchkit; here's an extra patch to fix an issue >> > with it uncovered by a recently-added testcase (in r254990). >> > >> > With the patch kit, but without this patch, g++'s >> > c-c++-common/pr83059.c >> > fails to emit the "invalid memory model argument 6" warning. >> > >> > Successfully bootstrapped®rtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, as >> > part of the kit. >> > >> > Is this OK for trunk, assuming the rest of the kit is approved? >> > >> > gcc/c-family/ChangeLog: >> > * c-common.c (get_atomic_generic_size): Call fold_for_warn >> > on the >> > params before checking for INTEGER_CST. >> > --- >> > gcc/c-family/c-common.c | 2 +- >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-common.c b/gcc/c-family/c-common.c >> > index 3438b87..ab03b7d 100644 >> > --- a/gcc/c-family/c-common.c >> > +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-common.c >> > @@ -6720,7 +6720,7 @@ get_atomic_generic_size (location_t loc, tree >> > function, >> > /* Check memory model parameters for validity. */ >> > for (x = n_param - n_model ; x < n_param; x++) >> > { >> > - tree p = (*params)[x]; >> > + tree p = fold_for_warn ((*params)[x]); >> > if (TREE_CODE (p) == INTEGER_CST) >> > { >> > /* memmodel_base masks the low 16 bits, thus ignore any >> > bits above >> >> Let's check the error case before we call fold_for_warn. >> >> Jason > > Do you mean like this? (bootstrapped; regrtest in progress)
Ah, no, sorry I wasn't clear. I meant to reorder the if/else there, so we check for INTEGER_TYPE first and potentially give an error, then fold, and then potentially warn. Jason