Hi Jason,
On 13/12/2017 23:27, Jason Merrill wrote:
These two don't match:
+ When initializing a temporary to be bound to the first
+ parameter of a constructor where the parameter is of type
+/* Return true if current_function_decl is a constructor
+ and its first argument is a reference type and it is
The language is talking about the function being called, and
ref_first_parm_of_constructor is looking at the function we're
currently in.
Indeed. Thanks Jason for the feedback.
I was going to send an improved patch, among other things using
CP_DECL_CONTEXT, when I noticed that this issue seems essentially a
special case of *your* core/899, right? For 899 we already have some
infrastructure in place and I believe we only have to figure out why we
don't handle correctly *arrays*, because otherwise we already accept a
similar testcase involving a plain 'Foo m' member. Please let me know,
otherwise I'm going to work in this direction!
Thanks again,
Paolo.
