> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> wrote: > > From: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com> > > > > Some external tools special case __gnu_lto* symbols, and the new > > __gnu_slim_lto > > was the only LTO symbol not matching this pattern. Since I don't think > > there are any users rename it to __gnu_lto_slim > > > > Passes bootstrap and test suite on x86_64-linux. Ok? > > Ok.
This is fine, thanks! The intended use is for binutils to make linker/ar/nm warn when they are run w/o plugin on slim objects and for linker plugin to make non-LTO mode behave properly (i.e. fat objects the non-LTO way and slim objects always the LTO way) Honza
