Hi, On Tue, 12 Dec 2017, David Malcolm wrote:
> There didn't seem to be a pre-existing way to determine the unique > out-edge after a GIMPLE_COND (if it has a constant cond), so I added > a new gimple_cond_get_unique_successor_edge function. Similarly, > something similar may apply for switches, so I put in a > gimple_get_unique_successor_edge (though I wasn't able to create a > reproducer that used a switch). Please instead extend find_taken_edge() (its sub routines). E.g. let it accept a NULL val and initialize it with the cond from a gcond. Ciao, Michael.
