> You are right, that was a mistake from our side to submit it again. We > had rediscovered the sequence using our scanning script and I forgot > that the sequence was harmless in this case. We will update our scripts > and revert the patch.
OK, thanks in advance. > The person here with write access, danielh, is currently traveling, so > we wont be able to revert it until next week. If it is urgent, could I > ask you to revert it for us? It's not that urgent of course but I've reverted it. -- Eric Botcazou
