FYI: Since James approved the Aarch64 part and since I think the generic part can be considered trivial, I have gone ahead and checked this patch in.
Steve Ellcey sell...@cavium.com On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 16:12 -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 17:35 +0000, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for the detailed explanation. I understood this, and my > > opinion is > > that the AArch64 parts of this patch are OK (and I don't know who > > needs to > > Ack the small generic changes you require). > > > > Let's give Richard/Marcus 48 hours to object while we wait for an > > OK on the > > generic bits, and then OK for AArch64. > > > > Thanks, > > James > > > > Reviewed-By: James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> > James, I haven't seen anything from Richard or Marcus. Do you think > a > review from a global maintainer is really needed? There is no > libatomic specific maintainer. The only non-aarch64 specific change > is using the macro IFUNC_RESOLVER_ARGS in place of the hardcoded > 'void' > argument for ifunc selector functions and for all non-aarch64 > platforms > the macro will be defined as 'void' so there is no real change for > any > other platform. > > Steve Ellcey > sell...@cavium.com
