On December 2, 2017 1:14:10 AM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> 
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>With -fsanitize=return, we add __builtin_ubsan_handle_missing_return
>instead of __builtin_unreachable with BUILTINS_LOCATION locus,
>the following patch teaches warn function return pass to handle that
>too.
>
>Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

OK. 

Richard. 

>2017-12-01  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
>
>       PR c++/81212
>       * tree-cfg.c (pass_warn_function_return::execute): Handle
>       __builtin_ubsan_handle_missing_return like __builtin_unreachable
>       with BUILTINS_LOCATION.
>
>       * g++.dg/ubsan/pr81212.C: New test.
>       * g++.dg/ubsan/return-1.C: Add -Wno-return-type to dg-options.
>       * g++.dg/ubsan/return-2.C: Add -Wno-return-type to dg-options.
>       * g++.dg/ubsan/return-7.C: Add -Wno-return-type to dg-options.
>
>--- gcc/tree-cfg.c.jj  2017-12-01 09:10:12.000000000 +0100
>+++ gcc/tree-cfg.c     2017-12-01 19:38:21.933049446 +0100
>@@ -9151,10 +9151,13 @@ pass_warn_function_return::execute (func
>         if (EDGE_COUNT (bb->succs) == 0)
>           {
>             gimple *last = last_stmt (bb);
>+            const enum built_in_function ubsan_missing_ret
>+              = BUILT_IN_UBSAN_HANDLE_MISSING_RETURN;
>             if (last
>-                && (LOCATION_LOCUS (gimple_location (last))
>-                    == BUILTINS_LOCATION)
>-                && gimple_call_builtin_p (last, BUILT_IN_UNREACHABLE))
>+                && ((LOCATION_LOCUS (gimple_location (last))
>+                     == BUILTINS_LOCATION
>+                     && gimple_call_builtin_p (last, BUILT_IN_UNREACHABLE))
>+                    || gimple_call_builtin_p (last, ubsan_missing_ret)))
>               {
>                 gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_for_stmt (last);
>                 gsi_prev_nondebug (&gsi);
>--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/pr81212.C.jj    2017-12-01
>19:30:43.251747933 +0100
>+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/pr81212.C       2017-12-01 19:30:25.000000000
>+0100
>@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
>+// PR c++/81212
>+// { dg-do compile }
>+// { dg-options "-Wreturn-type -fsanitize=return" }
>+
>+struct S
>+{
>+  S (void *);
>+  void *s;
>+};
>+
>+S
>+foo (bool x, void *y)
>+{
>+  if (x)
>+    return S (y);
>+}     // { dg-warning "control reaches end of non-void function" }
>--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/return-1.C.jj   2013-11-22
>21:05:59.000000000 +0100
>+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/return-1.C      2017-12-01 22:23:17.053866660
>+0100
>@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> // { dg-do run }
>-// { dg-options "-fsanitize=return" }
>+// { dg-options "-fsanitize=return -Wno-return-type" }
> // { dg-shouldfail "ubsan" }
> 
> struct S { S (); ~S (); };
>--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/return-2.C.jj   2014-10-22
>15:52:16.000000000 +0200
>+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/return-2.C      2017-12-01 22:23:32.059679081
>+0100
>@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> // { dg-do run }
>-// { dg-options "-fsanitize=return -fno-sanitize-recover=return" }
>+// { dg-options "-fsanitize=return -fno-sanitize-recover=return
>-Wno-return-type" }
> 
> struct S { S (); ~S (); };
> 
>--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/return-7.C.jj   2016-11-23
>20:50:51.000000000 +0100
>+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/return-7.C      2017-12-01 22:24:03.894281135
>+0100
>@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> // { dg-do run }
>-// { dg-options "-fsanitize=undefined" }
>+// { dg-options "-fsanitize=undefined -Wno-return-type" }
> // { dg-shouldfail "ubsan" }
> 
> struct S { S (); ~S (); };
>
>       Jakub

Reply via email to