Hi!

Now that the C++ FE emits __builtin_unreachable with BUILTINS_LOCATION
for fallthrough into end of function without returning value, we need to
see those in the warn_function_return pass which is right after building
cfg.  While GIMPLE_CONDs conditionally jumping to __builtin_unreachable are
only optimized during evrp and later, GIMPLE_SWITCH cases that branch to
__builtin_unreachable are unfortunately removed already during the cfg
cleanup in the cfg pass and thus the immediately following
warn_function_return pass can't warn.  Fixed by postponing that, e.g.
the evrp pass does unconditional TODO_cleanup_cfg, so those will be
optimized away pretty early (often already during ccp1).

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2017-11-30  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR sanitizer/81275
        * tree-cfg.c (group_case_labels_stmt): Don't optimize away
        C++ FE implicitly added __builtin_unreachable () until -Wreturn-type
        is diagnosed.

        * c-c++-common/tsan/pr81275.c: New test.

--- gcc/tree-cfg.c.jj   2017-11-30 11:40:38.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-cfg.c      2017-11-30 12:01:39.496311219 +0100
@@ -1750,7 +1750,14 @@ group_case_labels_stmt (gswitch *stmt)
 
       /* Discard cases that have an unreachable destination block.  */
       if (EDGE_COUNT (base_bb->succs) == 0
-         && gimple_seq_unreachable_p (bb_seq (base_bb)))
+         && gimple_seq_unreachable_p (bb_seq (base_bb))
+         /* Don't optimize this if __builtin_unreachable () is the
+            implicitly added one by the C++ FE too early, before
+            -Wreturn-type can be diagnosed.  We'll optimize it later
+            during switchconv pass or any other cfg cleanup.  */
+         && (gimple_in_ssa_p (cfun)
+             || (LOCATION_LOCUS (gimple_location (last_stmt (base_bb)))
+                 != BUILTINS_LOCATION)))
        {
          edge base_edge = find_edge (gimple_bb (stmt), base_bb);
          if (base_edge != NULL)
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/tsan/pr81275.c.jj        2017-11-28 
22:23:34.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/tsan/pr81275.c   2017-11-30 11:50:56.185274379 
+0100
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 /* PR sanitizer/81275 */
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-Wreturn-type -fsanitize=thread" } */
-/* { dg-skip-if "" { c++ } { "*" } { "-O0" } } */
 
 int
 f1 (int a, int b)

        Jakub

Reply via email to