Hi! This PR complains that seq_cost counts all non-single_set insns as 1 unconditionally, which is indeed bad. For some like compare + arithmetics we even have now code in pattern_cost that handles those reasonably by default, for others targets have the option through a hook to return whatever they want.
On the other side, IMNSHO we don't want to count CODE_LABELs, NOTEs, BARRIERs, DEBUG_INSNs... Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2017-11-29 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR middle-end/80929 * rtlanal.c (seq_cost): For non-single_set insns try to use insn_cost. --- gcc/rtlanal.c.jj 2017-10-27 14:16:39.000000000 +0200 +++ gcc/rtlanal.c 2017-11-27 13:35:46.321509933 +0100 @@ -5342,7 +5342,13 @@ seq_cost (const rtx_insn *seq, bool spee if (set) cost += set_rtx_cost (set, speed); - else - cost++; + else if (NONDEBUG_INSN_P (seq)) + { + int this_cost = insn_cost (CONST_CAST_RTX_INSN (seq), speed); + if (this_cost > 0) + cost += this_cost; + else + cost++; + } } return cost; Jakub