On 22 November 2017 at 12:26, Kyrill  Tkachov
<kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
> Hi Tamar,
>
> On 06/11/17 16:53, Tamar Christina wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This patch adds the NEON intrinsics for Dot product.
>>
>> Dot product is available from ARMv8.2-a and onwards.
>>
>> Regtested on arm-none-eabi, armeb-none-eabi,
>> aarch64-none-elf and aarch64_be-none-elf with no issues found.
>>
>> Ok for trunk?
>>
>> gcc/
>> 2017-11-06  Tamar Christina  <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
>>
>>         * config/aarch64/arm_neon.h (vdot_u32, vdotq_u32)
>
>
> This should be config/arm/arm_neon.h
>
>>         (vdot_s32, vdotq_s32): New.
>>         (vdot_lane_u32, vdotq_lane_u32): New.
>>         (vdot_lane_s32, vdotq_lane_s32): New.
>>
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/
>> 2017-11-06  Tamar Christina  <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
>>
>>         * gcc.target/arm/simd/vdot-compile.c: New.
>>         * gcc.target/arm/simd/vect-dot-qi.h: New.
>>         * gcc.target/arm/simd/vect-dot-s8.c: New.
>>         * gcc.target/arm/simd/vect-dot-u8.c: New
>>
>> --
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm_neon.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm_neon.h
> index
> 0d436e83d0f01f0c86f8d6a25f84466c841c7e11..419080417901f343737741e334cbff818bb1e70a
> 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm_neon.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm_neon.h
> @@ -18034,6 +18034,72 @@ vzipq_f16 (float16x8_t __a, float16x8_t __b)
>   #endif
>  +/* Adv.SIMD Dot Product intrinsics.  */
>
> Please no full stop: "AdvSIMD".
>
> +
> +#pragma GCC push_options
> +#if __ARM_ARCH >= 8
> +#pragma GCC target ("arch=armv8.2-a+dotprod")
>
> <snip>
>
Not sure if Kyrill actually meant to comment about the three lines
above, but they have a bug:
#if should be before #pragma GCC push_options.

Indeed, after this patch was committed (r255064), I've noticed many
regressions, for instance
p64_p128 is now unsupported. This is because the arm_crypto_ok
effective target now fails
with this message:
XXX/arm_neon.h:16911:1: error: inlining failed in call to
always_inline 'vaeseq_u8': target specific option mismatch

Not sure why this wasn't noticed in validations earlier?

Fixed as obvious (r255126).

Christophe

> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/vect-dot-qi.h
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/vect-dot-qi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index
> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90b00aff95cfef96d1963be17673dc191cc71169
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/vect-dot-qi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +TYPE char X[N] __attribute__ ((__aligned__(__BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__)));
> +TYPE char Y[N] __attribute__ ((__aligned__(__BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__)));
> +
> +__attribute__ ((noinline)) int
> +foo1(int len) {
> +  int i;
> +  TYPE int result = 0;
> +  TYPE short prod;
> +
> +  for (i=0; i<len; i++) {
> +    prod = X[i] * Y[i];
> +    result += prod;
> +  }
> +  return result;
> +}
> \ No newline at end of file
>
> Please add new lines at the end of the new test files.
> This applies to a few more new files in this patch.
>
> Ok with these nits fixed.
>
> Thanks,
> Kyrill
>
2017-11-24  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.l...@linaro.org>

        * config/arm/arm_neon.h: Fix pragma GCC push_options before
        vdot_u32.
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm_neon.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm_neon.h
index 3c9a8d9..d2e936c 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm_neon.h
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm_neon.h
@@ -18036,8 +18036,8 @@ vzipq_f16 (float16x8_t __a, float16x8_t __b)
 
 /* AdvSIMD Dot Product intrinsics.  */
 
-#pragma GCC push_options
 #if __ARM_ARCH >= 8
+#pragma GCC push_options
 #pragma GCC target ("arch=armv8.2-a+dotprod")
 
 __extension__ extern __inline uint32x2_t

Reply via email to