We've been warning about a base with different visibility while walking the fields list as well as the base list.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit de7f9f640df9dc1e181284009ba48ac281bef825 Author: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> Date: Fri Nov 17 17:13:40 2017 -0500 Avoid duplicate visibility warning. * decl2.c (constrain_class_visibility): Don't warn about artificial fields. diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl2.c b/gcc/cp/decl2.c index bc0db0000de..13e7b1d180a 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/decl2.c +++ b/gcc/cp/decl2.c @@ -2553,7 +2553,8 @@ constrain_class_visibility (tree type) vis = VISIBILITY_INTERNAL; for (t = TYPE_FIELDS (type); t; t = DECL_CHAIN (t)) - if (TREE_CODE (t) == FIELD_DECL && TREE_TYPE (t) != error_mark_node) + if (TREE_CODE (t) == FIELD_DECL && TREE_TYPE (t) != error_mark_node + && !DECL_ARTIFICIAL (t)) { tree ftype = strip_pointer_or_array_types (TREE_TYPE (t)); int subvis = type_visibility (ftype); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/warn6.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/warn6.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..256ebd2ad2f --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/warn6.C @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +struct __attribute ((visibility ("hidden"))) A { int i; }; +struct B: A { }; // { dg-warning "base" }