Hi,
On 9 November 2017 at 00:25, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/08/2017 10:36 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>> On 11/02/2017 04:33 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>> On 10/26/2017 10:34 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
>>>> [CCing Rainer and Mike for the gcc-dg.exp part]
>>>
>>>> My Tcl skills aren't great, so hopefully someone else can review this;
>>>> CCing Rainer and Mike.
>>>
>>> Ping?
>>>
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01911.html
>>>
>> Ping? A change to the column-checking logic the diagnostic processing.
> I'm not sure anyone's Tcl skills are great these days. I think most of
> us bash on it until it works the way we want and then try to return to
> productive work :-)
>
> If David's happy with the changes to the diagnostic machinery, then
> let's go ahead and move forward with this patch.
>
> jeff
I have just committed (r254949) the attached patch to fix a regression
in the arm tests after this was committed (r254691).
I hope it's obvious enough.
Christophe
2017-11-20 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org>
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/arm/pr69180.c: Use -: for no column in expected
warnings.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr69180.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr69180.c
index a43d0fe..1e978ef 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr69180.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr69180.c
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@
#pragma GCC target ("fpu=neon-fp-armv8")
#define __ARM_NEON_FP 0
-/* { dg-warning ".__ARM_NEON_FP. redefined" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
+/* { dg-warning "-:.__ARM_NEON_FP. redefined" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
#define __ARM_FP 0
-/* { dg-warning ".__ARM_FP. redefined" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
+/* { dg-warning "-:.__ARM_FP. redefined" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
#define __ARM_FEATURE_LDREX 0
-/* { dg-warning ".__ARM_FEATURE_LDREX. redefined" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
+/* { dg-warning "-:.__ARM_FEATURE_LDREX. redefined" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
*/
