On 11/03/2017 05:51 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: > Hi, > > as explained in > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg00105.html > we don't (necessarily) want to report non-executed blocks in Ada. > > The couple of attached patches prevent this from happening by detecting > whether we are dealing with an Ada file; the first variant is optimal, the > second variant is slightly more general in case other languages need it too. > > Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline (and which one)? > > > 2017-11-03 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com> > > * gcov.c (output_line_beginning): Document HAS_UNEXECUTED_BLOCK. > (output_lines): Always pass false for HAS_UNEXECUTED_BLOCK to > above function if this is for an Ada file. Is this still needed? I know Martin L did another teak for non-executed blocks in Ada... BUt I don't know enough to determine if it was sufficient to address this problem.
jeff
