Hi,
any feedback about this - apparently rather simple - issue?
On 03/11/2017 18:33, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
this ICE on valid (given GNU's designated initializers) is rather
simple to analyze: for the testcase, the gcc_assert in
process_init_constructor_array triggers because at that time INDEX1 is
still a CONST_DECL, not an INTEGER_CST. As regards fixing the problem,
I immediately noticed earlier today that fold_non_dependent_expr is
definitely able to fold the CONST_DECL to the expected zero
INTEGER_CST - and that also passes testing - but I'm not sure that in
the big picture folding at that time is correct. Thanks in advance for
any feedback!
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg00242.html
Thanks!
Paolo
