On 14/11/17 19:51 +0200, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On 14 November 2017 at 19:06, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:Both files can use remove_cv_t instead of remove_cv::type (and there's no need to std-qualify it in std::gcd).They could also use is_integral_v and is_same_v but that's pre-existing, and less important because there's no 'typename' that can be avoided by changing it.Here's round 2.
OK for trunk, thanks.
