PING^1
On 11/06/2017 09:27 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/03/2017 04:21 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote:
On 10/27/2017 09:44 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/27/2017 02:34 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
But when singly inheriting a polymorphic base and thus mapped to the same
vptr all but the last dtor will not be in charge, right?
Correct.
So, if using build_clobber_this for this, instead of clobbering what we
clobber we'd just clear the single vptr (couldn't clobber the rest, even
if before the store, because that would make the earlier other vptr stores
dead).
ok (I'd not looked at the patch to see if in chargeness was signficant)
nathan
Hello.
I'm sending v2 which only zeros vptr of object.
Ready to be installed after finishing tests?
Surely we also want to check TYPE_CONTAINS_VPTR_P.
Jason
Done that in attached patch.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Martin
