Hi, here is followup patch to add skylake-avx512.
gcc/
* config/i386/driver-i386.c (host_detect_local_cpu): Detect
skylake-avx512.> -----Original Message----- > From: Uros Bizjak [mailto:ubiz...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 5:05 PM > To: Koval, Julia <julia.ko...@intel.com> > Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Kirill Yukhin > <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [x86][patch] Add -march=cannonlake. > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Koval, Julia <julia.ko...@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Uros, > > I fixed comments. > > Btw, I haven't found skylake-avx512 in driver-i386.c at all. Is it intended > > or > should I add it? > > It looks like an oversight to me. If there are no "skylake-avx512" > model, then the driver goes through "This is unknown ..." for > -march=native and hopefully chooses the next most appropriate choice. > Please add "skylake-avx512" in a follow-up patch. > > > Thanks, > > Julia > > > > gcc/ > > * config.gcc: Add -march=cannonlake. > > * config/i386/driver-i386.c (host_detect_local_cpu): Detect > > cannonlake. > > * config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): Handle > > cannonlake. > > * config/i386/i386.c (processor_costs): Add m_CANNONLAKE. > > (PTA_CANNONLAKE): New. > > (processor_target_table): Add cannonlake. > > (ix86_option_override_internal): Ditto. > > (fold_builtin_cpu): Ditto. > > (get_builtin_code_for_version): Handle cannonlake. > > (M_INTEL_COREI7_CANNONLAKE): New. > > * config/i386/i386.h (TARGET_CANNONLAKE, > PROCESSOR_CANNONLAKE): New. > > * doc/invoke.texi: Add -march=cannonlake. > > gcc/testsuite/ > > * gcc.target/i386/funcspec-56.inc: Handle new march. > > * g++.dg/ext/mv16.C: Ditto. > > libgcc/ > > * config/i386/cpuinfo.c (get_intel_cpu): Handle cannonlake. > > * config/i386/cpuinfo.h (processor_subtypes): Add > INTEL_COREI7_CANNONLAKE. > > OK. > > Thanks, > Uros.
0001-skylake-512.patch
Description: 0001-skylake-512.patch
