Hi Steve, I read the correspondence on clf and your earlier posting here. With those in mind, the patch looks to be OK to commit.
Thanks Paul On 2 November 2017 at 01:09, Steve Kargl <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > The attached patch fixes a regression where gfortran was > issuing an error for an entity in a common block within > a module when it appears in equivalence, and the entity > *is not* use associated in a pure subprogram. OK to > commit? > > > 2017-11-01 Steven G. Kargl <ka...@gcc.gnu.org> > > PR fortran/82796 > * resolve.c (resolve_equivalence): An entity in a common block within > a module cannot appear in an equivalence statement if the entity is > with a pure procedure. > > 2017-11-01 Steven G. Kargl <ka...@gcc.gnu.org> > > PR fortran/82796 > * gfortran.dg/equiv_pure.f90: New test. > > -- > Steve -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
