On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Rich Felker <dal...@libc.org> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 06:16:57AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: >> crt1.o is used to create dynamic and non-PIE static executables. Static >> PIE needs to link with Pcrt1.o, instead of crt1.o, to relocate static PIE >> at run-time. When -pg is used with -static-pie, gPcrt1.o should be used. >> >> Tested on x86-64. OK for master? > > Is there a reason you didn't follow the existing naming practice here? > Openbsd and musl libc have both had static pie for a long time now and > have used rcrt1.o as the name.
I wasn't aware of rcrt1.o and there is no reference to rcrt1.o in GCC at all. Does the FSF GCC support static PIE for musl libc? If not, is there a GCC bug for it? BTW, I don't mind replacing Pcrt1.o/gPcrt1.o with rcrt1.o/grcrt1.o. -- H.J.
