The revised patch is attached. The differences are in what options are defined and propagated to Makefile for CET enabling.
Ok for trunk? Igor > -----Original Message----- > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Law > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 1:34 AM > To: Tsimbalist, Igor V <igor.v.tsimbal...@intel.com>; gcc- > patc...@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/22] Enable building libcilkrts with Intel CET > > On 10/12/2017 02:13 PM, Tsimbalist, Igor V wrote: > > Enable building libcilkrts with CET options. > > > > libcilkrts/ > > * Makefile.am: Add AM_CXXFLAGS and XCXXFLAGS. > > * configure.ac: Set CET_FLAGS, update XCFLAGS, XCXXFLAGS. > > * Makefile.in: Regenerate. > > * aclocal.m4: Likewise. > > * configure: Likewise. > > > So like the other patches in this space, the inclusion of cet.h seems > wrong. I don't see why this should be needed here. > > It's OK with that bit removed and once any prereqs are OK'd. > > jeff
0010-Enable-building-libcilkrts-with-Intel-CET.PATCH
Description: 0010-Enable-building-libcilkrts-with-Intel-CET.PATCH
