On 10/30/2017 01:21 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Looks good otherwise, WDYT?
Hi. Works for me, it's more precise! Thanks, Martin
nathan
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] GCOV: add -j argument (human readable ... Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] GCOV: add -j argument (human reada... Martin Liška
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] GCOV: add -j argument (human r... Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] GCOV: add -j argument (hum... Martin Liška
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] GCOV: add -j argument... Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] GCOV: add -j argu... Martin Liška
- [PATCH 7/7] GCOV: std::vector refactoring III marxin
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] GCOV: std::vector refactoring III Nathan Sidwell
- [PATCH 3/7] GCOV: add support for lines with an unexecuted ... marxin
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] GCOV: add support for lines with an un... Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] GCOV: add support for lines with a... Martin Liška
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] GCOV: add support for lines with an un... Eric Botcazou
- [PATCH 1/7] GCOV: document behavior of -fkeep-{static,inlin... marxin
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] GCOV: document behavior of -fkeep-{sta... Nathan Sidwell
- [PATCH 5/7] GCOV: std::vector refactoring. marxin
- Re: [PATCH 5/7] GCOV: std::vector refactoring. Nathan Sidwell
- [PATCH 6/7] GCOV: Vector refactoring II marxin
- Re: [PATCH 6/7] GCOV: Vector refactoring II Nathan Sidwell
- [PATCH 8/N][RFC] GCOV: support multiple functions per a lin... Martin Liška
- Re: [PATCH 8/N][RFC] GCOV: support multiple functions ... Nathan Sidwell
