Hi H.J.,
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 2:33 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Tsimbalist, Igor V
>> <igor.v.tsimbal...@intel.com> wrote:
>>> OK.
>>
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "endbr32" 2 { target ia32 } } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "endbr64" 2 { target { ! ia32 } } } }
>> */
>>
>> I think we can only check for {\mendbr} in the testcases. There are
>> already plenty of testcases that check for the correct instruction.
>>
>> Otherwise, LGTM
>>
>
> This is what I checked in.
the cet-sjlj-5.c test, like cet-sjlj-3.c, didn't account for an empty
USER_LABEL_PREFIX. Fixed as the previous one, installed.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
2017-10-25 Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>
* gcc.target/i386/cet-sjlj-5.c: Allow for emtpy user label prefix
in setjmp call.
# HG changeset patch
# Parent bca0754daa2001dcf85a01cd8be2aad3cbd48fcd
Fix gcc.target/i386/cet-sjlj-5.c on Solaris
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cet-sjlj-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cet-sjlj-5.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cet-sjlj-5.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cet-sjlj-5.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
/* { dg-options "-O -fcf-protection -mcet" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "endbr32" 2 { target ia32 } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "endbr64" 2 { target { ! ia32 } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "call _setjmp" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "call _?setjmp" 1 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "call longjmp" 1 } } */
#include <stdio.h>
