On Oct 17, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Tom de Vries <tom_devr...@mentor.com> wrote: > >>> OK, if full testing is ok? >> I believe this was fully intentional and the presence/absence of >> explicit dg-do run can then be used to decide if it should loop through >> options or not. > > I don't see an explicit mention of ignoring dg-do-what-default in the > original submission
So, my guidance would be for fortran to behave generally speaking, like other languages and for this type of code to be predictable across languages and library components. That's as far I can go, so, I'll have to punt the decision to domain experts to decide which direction they _want_ to go in. If they don't know (or don't care or can't agree and want someone to break a tie), my inclination is to approve it.
