On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Delesley Hutchins <deles...@google.com> wrote: > > --- gcc/tree-threadsafe-analyze.c (revision 179771) > +++ gcc/tree-threadsafe-analyze.c (working copy) > @@ -1830,14 +1830,27 @@ remove_lock_from_lockset (tree lockable, struct po
This feels like a bug in lock_set_contains(), not remove_lock_from_lockset(). I'd modify lock_set_contains() as follows: 1) During the universal lock conditional, remove the return statement. Instead, set default_lock = lock (where default_lock is a new variable initialized to NULL_TREE). 2) Anywhere NULL_TREE is returned later, replace it with default_lock. Ollie
