On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Alexandre Oliva <aol...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Oct  9, 2017, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The middle-end changes are ok.   The C FE change looks reasonable,
>> I'd appreciate a 2nd look at the C++ FE changes by a maintainer.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg02026.html
>
>
> Thanks a lot for the reviews!
>
> I've held off installing the approved patches and parts of this patch
> for the time being, awaiting the second look you requested (copying the
> C++ maintainers to get their attention), and also reviews for the
> subsequent patches (2 LVU and 2 IEPM).  Please let me know if you'd
> prefer me to go ahead and install the approved bits.

If the [SFN] is self-contained you can install that part once the approval
for the FE parts is in.  You can of course wait a bit for more reviews
(stopped short on LVU because of that all-targets touching patch ... ;))

Richard.

> --
> Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
> You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
> Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
> Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer

Reply via email to