On 06/10/17 13:44, Tamar Christina wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> this is a minor respin with changes echo'd from feedback from aarch64.
> I assume still OK for trunk.
> 
> Regtested on arm-none-eabi, armeb-none-eabi,
> aarch64-none-elf and aarch64_be-none-elf with no issues found.
> 
> Ok for trunk?
> 
> gcc/
> 2017-10-06  Tamar Christina  <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
> 
>         * config/arm/arm-builtins.c (arm_unsigned_uternop_qualifiers): New.
>         (UTERNOP_QUALIFIERS, arm_umac_lane_qualifiers, UMAC_LANE_QUALIFIERS): 
> New.
>         * config/arm/arm_neon_builtins.def (sdot, udot, sdot_lane, 
> udot_lane): new.
>         * config/arm/iterators.md (DOTPROD, VSI2QI, vsi2qi): New.
>         (UNSPEC_DOT_S, UNSPEC_DOT_U, opsuffix): New.
>         * config/arm/neon.md (neon_<sup>dot<vsi2qi>): New.
>         (neon_<sup>dot_lane<vsi2qi>, <sup>dot_prod<vsi2qi>): New.
>         * config/arm/types.md (neon_dot, neon_dot_q): New.
>         * config/arm/unspecs.md (sup): Add UNSPEC_DOT_S, UNSPEC_DOT_U.

OK if this passes a native bootstrap.

R.

> ________________________________________
> From: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 10:36:38 AM
> To: Tamar Christina; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: nd; Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard Earnshaw; ni...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][GCC][ARM] Dot Product NEON patterns [Patch (2/8)]
> 
> Hi Tamar,
> 
> On 01/09/17 14:33, Tamar Christina wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This patch adds the instructions for Dot Product to ARM along
>> with the intrinsics and vectorizer pattern.
>>
>> Armv8.2-a dot product supports 8-bit element values both
>> signed and unsigned.
>>
>> Dot product is available from Armv8.2-a and onwards.
>>
>> Regtested and bootstrapped on arm-none-eabi and no issues.
>>
>> Ok for trunk?
> 
> This is ok once the prerequisites are approved with one ChangeLog nit.
> 
> Kyrill
> 
>> gcc/
>> 2017-09-01  Tamar Christina  <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
>>
>>       * config/arm/arm-builtins.c (arm_unsigned_uternop_qualifiers): New.
>>       (UTERNOP_QUALIFIERS, arm_umac_lane_qualifiers, UMAC_LANE_QUALIFIERS): 
>> New.
>>       * config/arm/arm_neon_builtins.def (sdot, udot, sdot_lane, udot_lane): 
>> new.
>>       * config/arm/iterators.md (DOTPROD, DOT_MODE, dot_mode): New.
>>       (UNSPEC_DOT_S, UNSPEC_DOT_U, opsuffix): New.
>>       * config/arm/neon.md (neon_<sup>dot<dot_mode>): New.
>>       (neon_<sup>dot_lane<dot_mode>, <sup>dot_prod<dot_mode>): New.
>>       * config/arm/types.md (neon_dot, neon_dot_q): New.
>>       * config/arm/unspecs.md (UNSPEC_DOT_S, UNSPEC_DOT_U): New.
>>
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/iterators.md b/gcc/config/arm/iterators.md
> index 
> 7acbaf1bb40a4f270e75968804546508f7839e49..139e09fd929e17216ad9383505f1453a73d071fb
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/config/arm/iterators.md
> 
> --snip---
> 
>   
> ;;----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   ;; Code attributes
>   
> ;;----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> @@ -816,6 +822,7 @@
>     (UNSPEC_VSRA_S_N "s") (UNSPEC_VSRA_U_N "u")
>     (UNSPEC_VRSRA_S_N "s") (UNSPEC_VRSRA_U_N "u")
>     (UNSPEC_VCVTH_S "s") (UNSPEC_VCVTH_U "u")
> +  (UNSPEC_DOT_S "s") (UNSPEC_DOT_U "u")
>   ])
> 
> In your ChangeLog you list this as "New" whereas your patch just adds them to 
> the "sup" int_attr.
> 

Reply via email to